You are ready. You don’t read math book like you read a novel. You can literally spend days on one page. You are not going to find a better book than Halmos’s. Every mathematician agrees that every mathematician must know some set theory; the Naive Set Theory. Authors; (view affiliations). Paul R. Halmos. Book. Every mathematician agrees that every mathematician must know some set theory; the disagreement begins in trying to decide how much is some. This book.
|Published (Last):||21 September 2004|
|PDF File Size:||14.79 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.93 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Different if they do not. Transfinite recursion Transfinite recursion is an analogue to the ordinary recursion theorem, in a similar way that transfinite induction is an analogue to mathematical induction – halmoss functions for infinite sets beyond w. There was little exploration of each axiom, what it cost and what it bought, and what alternate forms are available.
Build your knowledge in solid steps.
Naive Set Theory
Sign up using Facebook. I have a number of loose ends to tie up before jumping in to Model Theory, and I have much less familiarity with the subject matter. If you do have a somewhat fitting background, I think this should be a very competent pick to deepen your understanding of set theory.
Product Description Product Details This classic by one of the twentieth century’s most prominent mathematicians offers a concise introduction to set theory. This follows from the axiom of choice. I can imagine that that would require some actual set theory.
I’m extremely surprised you never came across it before given that you’ve taken courses in, e. Set theory is more mature now than it was then. To ask other readers questions about Naive Set Theoryplease sign up. Puzzled by the bit about Russell’s paradox at the end of the chapter?
Naive Set Theory (book) – Wikipedia
Please take these reviews with a grain of salt, as sample size is 1 and I have not read any similar textbooks. Some specific subjects analysis, type theory, group theory, etc. It means you can make conclusions about infinite sets haomos w, where mathematical induction isn’t sufficient. Soul rated it it was amazing Aug 02, Sep 20, Feier hallelujah rated it it was amazing.
The high school didn’t teach any theoretical foundation of math at all. I found this book to be rather basic. Gene Taylor rated it it was amazing Sep 25, While I’ve always had a knack for math, I only read about 2 months of mathematics at introductory university level, and not including discrete mathematics.
All in all, the book covers lot of ground at a fast clip, and was quite useful. Your phrasing in point 4 is very convoluted.
A bit into the book, I started struggling with the exercises. I’ve long believed that math is a poor and inconsistent language. I was pleased with this book. Axiom of extension The axiom of extension tells us how to distinguish between sets: To the author’s credit, they point out many of the inconsistencies: Did a Directed Reading Program with an undergraduate interested in logic with this book.
How does it fit in to the larger subject of mathematics? For machine learning, you will be a user of sets and you might do some calculation on sets but you won’t be doing research into what sets are and what are the limits of what they can do. Minskyit is quite a nice little book – especially for beginners ; it helps you get nicely primed and ready for ProofsFirst-Order LogicSet TheoryFunctions etc.
Naive Set Theory by Halmos is confusing to a layman like me – Mathematics Stack Exchange
For example, a totally ordered set can have multiple elements without a predecessor. Want to Read saving…. It’s seemed very fundamental but school never gave me a good opportunity to learn it.
Discussion Before diving in to the review it’s fheory to remember that the usefulness of a math textbook is heavily dependent upon your math background.
In general, if the book doesn’t offer you enough explanation on a subject, search the Internet. Most of these gripes are small compared to the amount of good data in the book. Axioms were presented as facts, not tools. Only a few exercises are designated as such since the st itself is an ongoing series of exercises with hints. Paul Halmos is often held up as a paragon of mathematical writing, and theorry this book one can see why. I think Halmos’ Naive Set Theory is primarily concerned with set theory as a foundation on top of which mathematics is built, but the word “naive”, if I understand correctly, just means he’s viewing the concept of a set concretely as a collection of things rather than axiomatically as being whatever satisfies the axioms.
This text shows its age — it’s heavily wordy and pretty light on presenting things in mathematical notation. This book seems well-suited for a layperson interested in learning set theory.
Sometimes, I read other sources even before reading the chapter in the book. Nov 04, Shibajee Samaddar rated it it was amazing.